5 questions Uncle Sam Can’t Answer

Disclaimer: This article is being written for informational purpose. It has nothing to do with defaming any one or any country. If you have any issues regarding this article you can contact me by the address provided on the contact page.

Shading a little knowledge from the past:

Let me just explicate the background of the article…We all know America was attacked in 2001 by an organization called Al Qaeda.Later, in retaliation American government, with the help of NATO forces attacked Afghanistan (which is known as the base of Al Qaeda & Taliban) and Iraq (CIA reported Iraq possessed Nuclear Weapons).

Now, America is trying to negotiate with Taliban (Qatar negotiations is an example in front of us). At the same time it’s threatening Syria to give up its chemical weapons.

In our journalism class, our teacher told us that Samsung company remains on top in the market by a simple strategy called ‘The invisible enemy’. It keeps its workers on their heels by telling them that if they do not work productively someone else will take their place. This strategy works and the company stays on top in the game.

It will be explained in the end why I used this example here.

As you have understood the history, I will keep some questions in front of us. I will assume that I am sitting in front of America (suppose state has turned human) and asking these questions. I will give my own interpretation which you guys can correct by posting in the comment box below. Here we go…

1. Attack on world trade center could not have been possible without help from inside. How many insiders have you caught and punished so far?

We all know that whenever a country is attacked from inside, then there is surety that some hidden moles are persisting in the system. In case of World Trade Center, American Government did not blame anyone except the 16 people whose passports were found by the American government after the crash. These 16 people were later linked to Alqaeda. But, we have not heard that any American was held responsible or even interrogated.

2. You said you won the war on terror. Then how come you are negotiating with Taliban in Qatar?

Let me just state that After American Navy Seals attacked Osama bin Laden in Quetta, Obama delivered a speech in white house. One of the words he used in that speech were ‘justice has been served’. This would have led to American victory and America should have been rolling out its forces from Afghanistan by now. But that did not happen; instead we are seeing that by the help of Pakistani counterparts America is trying to negotiate with Taliban on friendly terms.

3. You were successful in taking your revenge for ‘the empty seat at the dinner table’ by waging war on terror. But do you think that in your bid to take revenge you have made many more seats empty?

2966 people died in World Trade Center plane crash. That is a huge number and my condolences are with them. But, the figures of causalities in Iraq, Afghanistan and Pakistan are a little higher if I am not wrong. 0.2 million people were killed in the war on terror in Iraq alone.  0.13million people were killed in the war on terror in the last 10 years in Afghanistan and 49000 people were killed in the war on terror and bombing incidents in Pakistan. Compiling all of them we get, close to 0.4million people killed in the war on terror in the last 10 years. Waging a war for 3000 souls and killing 400000 souls in the process.

4. You attacked Iraq because they had nuclear weapons. Now that you have won the war, can you make the findings of those nuclear weapons public?

According to Wikipedia, the operation desert fox was launched to deprive Iraq from producing nuclear weapons. However, no solid evidence was found regarding the Iraq nuclear weapon program. And even those centrifuge tubes that were found in Iraq by different agencies were specifically for some other purposes as Cited by IAEA in 2003. But if it is supposed that these findings by those agencies were inaccurate. So, where are the weapons that were found by Americans? I think public wants to see what American bounty in Iraq war was.

5. You are going to attack Syria because they used chemical weapons. Do you think it is also legitimate to attack those who used nuclear weapons in World War II?

When America bombed Hiroshima and Nagasaki in Japan 0.2 million people died. These were civilian causalities and the bombings were intentionally done in the urban part of the city. The diameter of the bombings was 5 kilometers. Let us compare that with Syrian government attack or the rebel attack (as its still unknown who did it). The bombings damaged parts of Ghouta, Syria. Additionally, At most 2000 people were killed in the attack.

The matter was taken very seriously by the United Nations and some options were put in front of the veto countries in Security Council. One of the options was to attack Syria to limit its use of chemical weapons. China, Russia and England all opposed this option. However, USA reluctantly said that if no one wants to attack Syria, it will attack by itself. The matter is still a debate in the national assembly of UN, British Parliament and American Congress.

But United Nation was formed two months after the nuclear attack. Why it did not pass a resolution to Attack USA for the nuclear attack after its formation? And how can we assume that USA is doing the right job by attacking Syria when USA, itself has the largest stock of Chemical weapons, A-bombs and H-bombs.

Final Words:

As I said earlier, American Government is using the same tactics that Samsung used (as per our Teacher). It is keeping its own public ill informed and making them imagine that an invisible enemy is always ready to attack their country.